ATOS
involvement in the Paralympics is nothing more than pure hypocrisy. It has been
reported today that another one of ATOS’s victims has died. Cecilia Burns, who
was fighting breast cancer, was told by ATOS that she was fit to work, and as
such lost part of her benefits, only to have them reinstated at appeal. Now, I’m
not claiming that ATOS killed her; however, I would bet good money that the
stress, worry and extra work needed to fight the ATOS decision won’t have
helped her illness. Nearly 60% of all appeals are upheld against ATOS’s assessments,
which is hardly surprising when they deem you fit for work so long as you have
a finger and can push a button. I kid you not. An undercover Dispatches
documentary last month, showed just how utterly corrupt, heartless and
unworkable their assessment criteria are.
The
documentary proved beyond any doubt that the assessments are corrupt and that
the whole process is entirely geared up to kicking disabled people off
benefits, regardless of whether they are fit for work or not. Unless you are a
total vegetable, the chances are good that they will deem you fit for work, and
therefore not entitled to full benefits. Even then, you will still be required
to attend further assessments to make sure your condition hasn’t changed or
improved. Jesus wept! As anyone who knows anything about genuine disabilities
will tell you, they don’t get better; they only get worse as you get older.
I have
Cerebral Palsy and I have had from birth, there is no cure or effective
treatment for what I’ve got, save for lots of operations to stop the muscles
from tightening up to crippling levels (as they did when I was a teenager). I
am not faking my condition, and believe me I wish there was a cure, but there
isn’t. Consequently, I have to manage the best that I can and I need the extra
financial assistance I get, as well as my car, otherwise I would be stuck at
home and unable to contribute in any way to the world. Granted, I am not as bad
as some and I can go out and work, but the work that I can do is very limited.
I can’t for example work full time 9-5, for five days a week with only a month’s
holiday a year; I would be worn out and most likely dead within a year.
Therefore, I earn very little and I don’t have the abilities or prospects to be
able to relocate or move into another area of employment. Effectively I am
stuck.
Therefore,
given how heartless, unworkable and how much extra stress and worry these
assessments are putting on genuine disabled people, ATOS’s involvement in the
Paralympics is the sickest, cruellest joke going. Disability fraud accounts for
about 0.5%, and whilst I totally agree that the “bad back, salsa dancing
brigade” need to be weeded out, these assessments need to be made more
realistic and compassionate. I mean, nearly everyone can push a bloody button,
but good luck finding a job where that’s all you have to do, that pays more
than what you’d get on benefits.
Also, the
0.5% who commit these frauds against the system and claim disability benefits
when they shouldn’t is way less than the number of MPs who fraudulently claimed
on their expenses, for second homes, mortgage payments and family members
working for them.
Alas, as I
keep banging on, until this apathetic nation collectively gets off its backside
and takes a leaf out of the French playbook, nothing in this country is going
to change. Our political elites will keep sodomising us and abusing the weakest
members of society, whilst failing to tackle money wasting bureaucracy,
Quangos, tax loopholes and all kinds of corrupt fiddles and schemes.
Whilst, you watch the Paralympics, spare a
thought for all those poor disabled people who are being abused and treated
like dirt by ATOS and the heartless assessments
6 comments:
Research Material?
http://asaintcalledallnights.blogspot.co.uk/
Jesus, what a sorry, ATOS at the paralympics is an f'ing joke.
Zey vere only obeying orders! Seig HMG!
Hi CC!
Words fail, Yes there are a tiny minority of disabled who could work but don't. There are many, many more able bodied benefits cheats/tax dodgers some of them our erstwhile 'leaders' past, and I suspect present who ought to have their collars felt.
Would you rather work, given the choice? If the government supported you in a job you could do, and required you to work that job to get your disability benefit, would you be happy to do that? I appreciate it's not an option, and not something that seems to have really been discussed, but to me it's the obvious solution. Exactly like workfare, which is an equally good idea the government seems incapable of implementing well, but with more support to reflect the extra needs caused by disabilities.
I don't like the idea of anyone being able to live on benefits, and not contributing what they can to society. Different people can contribute different things and different amounts, which is why the black and white lines ATOS are required to draw are completely unhelpful. To my mind, rather than getting an idiotic company like ATOS to decide who can and can't work, it's better to help people do what they can. It's better for society, for the individuals and for the economy.
I'd be interested to hear whether you'd be happy to work for your benefits or not, and why.
"I'd be interested to hear whether you'd be happy to work for your benefits or not, and why."
Susie.
What kind of question is that to ask people who are on benefit because they CANNOT work? How could we work for benefit if we can`t work for a proper wage?? It is NOT a lifestyle choice I can`t believe this question!
Hi, everyone, thanks for the comments. Sussie, I tend to agree with Anon above. I would much rather work, than be stuck at home and thus contribute in some way to society. However, when it comes to disability benefits, I don't believe people should have to work for those. You get disability benefits because life is a bloody hard struggle for us disabled, and the money and help is there to try and make it a little easier.
So, no, I don't believe people should have to work for disability benefit.
Post a Comment